Designing Flight Experience

May 1, 2010

As an airline company, how would you enhance the flight experience of your customers? Remember, the airline industry is generally risk averse and require a lot of capital to run. I attended a breakfast conference where Hudson Smales (Air New Zealand) and Shailesh Manga (Optimal Usability) talked about the process they went thru to deliver a better experience at Air New Zealand.

In early 2007, the CEO of Air New Zealand decided to rethink their longhaul in-flight experience. Their timeline: end of 2010 – delivery of their new Boeing 777-300ER. They recruited IDEO to better understand their customers and how they fly (behaviours, attitude and goals). One thing they did, among others, was to fly themselves on Air New Zealand and on competitors. They came up with 5 different types of customers; personas. They used The Simpsons to personify them. The first 3 are anti-socials and the last 2 are socials.

  • Mr Burns who knows exactly what he wants and knows what he is entitled. Frequent flyers usually fall under this type. It’s the territorial type.
  • Lisa who just want to get wrapped up in the in-flight entertainment.
  • Mo (bartender) is simply disengaged and just wants to arrive.
  • Marge who wants to talk to everybody and love the glamour of flying
  • Bart who just love to talk without the glamour of flying

During the whole process, they kept in mind these 5 customer core values:

  • More control over the journey experience.
  • Variety in product and service experience.
  • Free from emotional and physical trap of seat.
  • More New Zealandness.
  • Respectful but genuine service.

With the 5 personas and these core values, Air NZ decided to invite 4 New Zealand design companies to brainstorm seat designs: what was called Seat bootcamp. On one day, all 4 were asked to present their ideas, all of them were discussing in the same hangar in Auckland. They reviewed these 19 designs and finally chose 5 of them that would be prototyped (wood, styrofoam, etc) At that stage, Optimal Usability was involved to carry on Usability sessions with these 5 concepts, they decided to simulate 1 hour flight with actors by asking them to act as their given personas (the Simpsons).

Afterward, they took ideas from 3 concepts to create a new one that was tested with real customers and for a longer simulated flight (2 hours). Interestingly, in both cases, they simulated all flight phases (take off, cruising, landing, etc) but they also served meals and simulated in-flight noises. They finally come up with the Skycouch that you would see in the following video. There is also so shots of seat concepts.

Inside the aircraft, there will still be standard economy seats, only few rows will be transformed into Skycouch seats.

With these Boeing, Air NZ wants to go away from Selling seats and become a company who Sells experience. They still have a nice challenge: how to sell these new seats to the appropriate customers. Part of the challenge will be on their website and how they present this new experience to customers that would be interested in.

References:
Air New Zealand – Future Taking Flight
_________

Data Visualisation Talk at Wellington Web Design Meetup

April 10, 2010

I did a talk last Thursday during the Wellington Web Design Meetup about Data Visualization. It’s incredible how data visualization can be used efficiently to communicate:

  • to make a point
  • to form a hypothesis
  • to help achieve a goal

February User Experience Quote – Saint-Exupery

February 28, 2010

A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away

- Antoine de Saint-Exupery, French Writer and Aviator

That’s a lovely one, especially when we see so many features proliferating  everywhere…

Data Visualization by Toby Segaran @ Webstock

February 21, 2010

I attended a Workshop (at Webstock 2010) called Data Visualization that was very insightful. Wikipedia defines data visualization as “the study of the visual representation of data“. It’s incredible how you can present data in different ways and how it can affect the level of reader’s understanding. In fact, data visualization is used to make a point, to communicate raw / unfamiliar data.

One of Toby Segaran’s projects was to show openings of new WalMart stores from 1962 to 2007 with the first one in Arkansas. It’s quite funny to see how it spread. By watching his video, it’s much more easier to understand the evolution of WalMart in USA than by just looking at a table showing new store locations by year and by city.

He mentioned two tools that can be used freely to make your own data visualization:

I haven’t tried these yet, but I’m looking forward to it. It’s important to be able to translate raw (dull) data into something meaningful to the reader.

He also talked about good and bad visualization, for example, a 3D pie chart is usually not a good idea if you want to compare figures. Let’s see with the following example of a 3D pie chart that shows 5 companies and their market share, which one from A and C have the biggest market share?

3D pie chart - Difficult to compare data

The answer is both companies (A and C) have a 20% of the market. In that case, a 2D bar chart might be a better idea if you have to compare these data. Some readers might say that you only have to add percentages to the pie charts, yes it would help but still, visually, there will be a favorable bias toward company C which seems to have a much bigger pie chart.

Presenting data in a way that is easier to understand is important but be careful to not create a bias in your graph.

References:
Toby Segaran’s article about WalMart data visualization
Webstock 2010 Wellington – NZ  based web and development conference
Definition of Data Visualization (Wikipedia)